Page 1 of 3
Topic: WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS
INVESTIGATION/ADMINISTRATION Date Issued: June 29, 1994
Section: WORKERS' COMPENSATION Date Revised:
Number:
XXI.3.
PURPOSE:
To
provide County departments with an understanding of the process involved
in
determining eligibility for Workers' Compensation benefits.
LEGAL
BASIS:
Division
4 of the Labor Code of the State of California, and California
Civil
Code, Part 2.6, Chapter 2, Section 56.10(c)(8)(A)
POLICY:
I. The County is mandated by the State to
provide specified benefits to
employees with work-related injuries.
II. The definition of a work-related injury is
an injury which arises out
of employment (AOE) and/or occurs in the
course of employment (COE).
Each claim for Workers' Compensation
benefits must be reviewed to
determine whether it meets these
criteria. If the information provid-
ed on the injury reports is unclear,
steps must be taken to gather
sufficient information to make this
determination. This section out-
lines procedures followed by Risk
Management and the Workers' Compen-
sation claims administrator in gathering
the data needed to either
directly determine eligibility, or to
provide to a medical evaluator
who will make this determination.
PROCEDURE:
I. Claims Review and Followup
When Risk Management receives the
required documents supporting a
Workers' Compensation injury, the
documents are first reviewed for
completeness and proper signatures. The documents would include orig-
inals of Employee's Claim for Workers'
Compensation Benefits; Supervi-
sors' Report of Accident and, if the employee
received medical atten-
tion and/or lost work time, the
Employer's Report of Occupational
XXI.3
Page 2
of 3 WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS INVESTIGATION/ADMINISTRATION
Injury/Illness. If the injury and causation are described in suffi-
cient detail to leave no doubt that the
injury happened at work and
appears to have a connection to work
duties (example: a Building
Maintenance Worker who cut his/her hand
while repairing a broken win-
dow), Risk Management forwards the
paperwork to the claims administra-
tor without further action.
II. Questionable Claims
In some cases, the relationship of the
injury to the job is unclear.
An example of this would be an office
worker who has been on vacation
for two weeks, who files a Workers'
Compensation claim on the morning
s/he returns, reporting fever, sore
throat and nasal congestion which
s/he claims are the result of the air
handling system. In this case,
Risk Management would check with the
supervisor to confirm there had
not been any ventilation problems that
morning in that work area, and
relay that information, along with the
claim, to the claims adminis-
trator.
The claims administrator would send a notice to the employee
that his/her claim was being delayed, and
request that s/he provide
medical documentation to support his/her
claim. Ultimately, in a case
of this type, medical records would
determine whether the work envi-
ronment caused the injury. In the absence of a positive work connec-
tion, this claim would be denied.
A.
Stress Claims
Stress claims are a special type of
questionable claim. They are
automatically considered questionable
because, unlike the Build-
ing Maintenance Worker who was cut on a piece of window glass,
it is difficult to determine the
cause, or even if there is an
injury. Current Workers' Compensation laws require that actual
events of employment must be the
predominant cause of the psychi-
atric injury. This means that personal factors, as well as
work-related issues, must be
included in the data gathered to
make a determination. All stress claims, unless the cause was
clearly a traumatic work event (such
a being a victim of a vio-
lent act, or from direct exposure to
a significant violent act),
will be fully investigated.
1.
To assist the claims administrator in evaluating the claim,
the supervisor completing the
Supervisor's Report of Acci-
dent should attach a memo
outlining any relevant informa-
tion, or send the memo
separately in a CONFIDENTIAL envelope
to Risk Management.
2.
Risk Management will contact the department personnel liai-
son to gather information and
determine which staff members
should be interviewed by the outside
claims investigator.
3.
The claims administrator will contact the claimant to find
out the circumstances
surrounding the claim, and explain the
process for investigating a
Workers' Compensation stress
claim. The claims administrator will mail the
claimant a
notice that benefit
determination is delayed pending inves-
XXI.3
WORKERS'
COMPENSATION CLAIMS INVESTIGATION/ADMINISTRATION Page 3 of 3
tigation, that the claimant may
be contacted by an outside
claims investigator, and that
final determination will be
made within 90 days. They will also send the claimant a
medical release to complete and return, so that they
can
request records from all
medical providers consulted by the
employee over the past five
years.
4.
The claims investigator will take statements from the claim-
ant, claimant's supervisor, and
co-workers having knowledge
of the claimant's work and
personal situation. Records in
the claimant's departmental
personnel file and central per-
sonnel file in the Personnel Department will be copied to be
included with the
investigator's report. The County pre-
employment physical records
will also be requested.
5.
The claimant is then scheduled for a psychiatric evaluation
with a specialist knowledgeable
in criteria for evaluating
Workers' Compensation stress
claims. This evaluator will
review all medical records, the
investigative report, and
any other pertinent
information, and perform a comprehensive
psychiatric evaluation of the
claimant before issuing a
written report. If the evaluator finds that work factors
(other than "lawful,
non-discriminatory, good faith person-
nel actions") represented
less than the preponderance of
causation, the claims
administrator will send a notice of
denial of benefits. If the evaluator feels the claim is
compensable, benefits will be
paid retroactive to the first
day of disability.
***
PAM2103
RFT F1 01/10/01